Thear y seng biography template

Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau left and Indian prime minister Narendra Modi right meeting at […]. You must be logged in to post a comment. Skip to content. Posted on January 25, January 25, by Amy Herd. Share this: Email. Related Posts. Climate Columnists International Print Edition. Climate change and its effects have been felt across the globe, with rising sea levels, […] Share this: Email.

Columnists Economics International. Among a flurry of policy initiatives implemented by the Biden administration, some of the most […] Share this: Email. Columnists International. Leave a Reply Cancel reply You must be logged in to post a comment. We found that elections can actually prolong dictatorships in the longer term…. But autocrats also gain something from holding elections.

There is a long-standing debate among political scientists on whether elections are, on balance, stabilizing or destabilizing for dictatorships. We argue that they are both, but with a key nuance: Elections confer long-term benefits. The regime can co-opt members of the opposition, for instance, or learn more about the strength of the opposition.

Elections also help dictators build a strong organizational apparatus and signal their strength to intimidate potential opponents…. Drawing on data from autocratic regimes across the world, from to , we test these concepts, by analyzing the dynamic relationship between autocratic elections and the risk of regime breakdown, using different statistical models….

We think this is an important underlying reason that autocrats like Marcos take the gamble of holding elections, despite the risks to the regime around Election Day. The party in power, the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, for decades managed to conduct elections without seeing major threats to its grip on power. In fact, studies by political scientists argue that the PRI used these elections as a device to prolong its rule.

The party used elections to selectively co-opt supporters — but deter opponents by displaying organizational strength and broad public appeal. These stabilizing effects continued long past election day. RFA: Legal and International Affairs expert Theary Seng continues to strongly believe that in order to have CNRP alive again requires that the opposition figures and the democrats exercise their right to demand and boycott the upcoming elections because to participate in such elections is only to confer legitimacy the Hun Sen government that has been oppressing the CNRP: "CNRP is still alive because the people have never accepted the regime's dissolution.

It cannot be dissolved because it was unconstitutional. This and next year , boycott the election process; don't register, don't campaign, don't raise party signs; only then can the CNRP as a party be made alive again. I explain further the Strategy of Disruption by focusing on Myanmar, and why the Free World stand alongside the Burmese democrats in refusing to accept the legitimacy of the Junta regime.

As point of comparison to the Cambodian situation: what lessons can we draw from the Burmese strategy? She and her surviving family trekked across the border for Thailand in Nov. Mom and Dad, date of photograph unknown. Since Feb. Read more Theary's BLOG. Retrieved 13 February Radio Free Asia. Theary Seng". Clooney Foundation For Justice.

South China Morning Post. Seng and the Road Ahead in Cambodia". Asia Fortune News. BBC News.

Thear y seng biography template

New York Times Blog. External links [ edit ]. Authority control databases.